Transparency
The English text on this page is the source text. The Japanese text is provided for reference and contextual clarification only.
See: Methodology · J-HAB · Evidence Mapping · White Paper · Data Access · Errata & Corrections · Terms · Privacy Policy
Purpose
This page provides a baseline transparency summary for SGT Lab survey-based publications. Study-specific details are documented on the corresponding issue records and released publications where applicable.
SGT Lab publications are intended to present descriptive, non-normative evidence. Transparency disclosures are provided to support interpretation, citation, and review of the published results; they do not constitute certification, accreditation, regulatory approval, audit, or assurance.
Minimum disclosure / Baseline transparency
The items below describe the baseline disclosure approach used for J-HAB and related SGT Lab survey publications. Issue-specific values take precedence where they are stated on the applicable issue record.
| Item | Disclosure |
|---|---|
| Geographic scope | Japan (nationwide), unless otherwise specified on the issue record. |
| Data collection mode | Online survey research. Unless otherwise stated on the applicable issue record, samples are collected using a non-probability online access panel. |
| Fieldwork provider | Fieldwork may be outsourced to a third-party research or panel provider. Provider information and material operational details are disclosed at the issue level to the extent they can appropriately be made public. |
| Sample size | Documented on the applicable issue record. |
| Target population | Documented on the applicable issue record (including relevant age range and other study-specific eligibility conditions). |
| Fieldwork period | Documented on the applicable issue record. |
| Quota / allocation design | Material quota, allocation, and weighting decisions are documented on the applicable issue record. |
| Measurement framework | J-HAB (Japan Home AI Boundary) organizes self-reported responses across Spatial Context, System Behavior, and Data Governance. |
| Core measure | Reluctance (R5) — self-reported psychological hesitation / resistance in defined home AI contexts. Japanese questionnaire term: 「抵抗（抵抗感）」. |
| Additional domain-specific measures | Depending on the issue and measurement domain, additional self-report scales may include Permission / human-intervention requirement, Sensitivity Expectation, Reassurance, Retention Allowance, and Consent. |
| Definitions and scales | Maintained under versioned specifications. See Methodology . |
| Specification identifier | Starting from 2025, issue records identify the applicable J-HAB specification version using a Spec ID. |
| Weighting | Any weighting or non-weighting decision is documented on the applicable issue record. |
| Quality control (QC) | Material study-specific quality-control or exclusion procedures are documented at the issue level when applicable and available for public disclosure. Additional controlled documentation may be handled under the published Data Access policy. |
| Interpretation | Results are presented as descriptive, non-normative evidence. Self-reported responses should not be interpreted as direct behavioral observations, causal findings, forecasts, or normative determinations of acceptability. |
| Revision / correction record | Publication revisions are identified by revision numbers (e.g., Rev.01). Material corrections or methodological updates are documented through the applicable issue record and/or Errata & Corrections . |
Current published issue
The current published J-HAB baseline issue is:
Disclosure principles
SGT Lab distinguishes between information required to interpret published evidence and controlled operational documentation that may not always be appropriate for unrestricted public disclosure.
- Published results should identify the applicable issue, revision, and measurement specification.
- Material study-design information should be disclosed at the issue level where applicable.
- Verbatim questionnaire wording, full response-option wording, questionnaire logic, operational QC details, and related controlled documentation may be managed separately from public summaries.
- Where controlled materials can be provided for independent review, they are handled under the published Data Access policy.
- Public explanatory updates should not silently alter historical published data or numerical results.
Research integrity contact
For inquiries regarding disclosure items, methodological clarification, or citation:
contact@sgtlab.org
Terminology and disclosure language were aligned with the current J-HAB Methodology and published 2025 issue. The underlying Rev.01 survey data and numerical results were not changed.
参考（日本語・補足）
本ページは、SGT Labの調査・刊行物について、 結果を解釈するために必要な透明性情報の基本方針をまとめたものです。 各号固有の情報は、該当する号ページおよび公開PDFを優先して参照してください。
J-HAB（Japan Home AI Boundary）では、 家庭用AIに対する自己申告の反応を 空間文脈、 システム挙動、 データガバナンス の3つの測定領域で整理します。
Reluctance（抵抗感）は、 J-HABにおける主要な測定概念の一つです。 領域に応じて、 許可／人の介入要求、 慎重さ、 安心、 保存期間の許容、 同意などの自己申告尺度も使用します。
各号について、 対象地域、対象者、実査期間、 サンプルサイズ、 回収・割付設計、 ウェイトの有無等を 該当する号ページに記録します。
各調査で重要な品質管理・除外手順があり、 公開可能な場合は号レベルで記録します。 統制文書として管理する情報については、 必要に応じて Data Access 方針に基づき取り扱います。
結果は自己申告による回答分布を 記述的・非規範的に示すものです。 実際の行動観測、因果推論、将来予測、 社会的な許容／不許容の規範判断を示すものではありません。
詳細な測定概念・尺度・設計方針については Methodology を参照してください。